Shared Use of Physical Activity Facilities Among North Carolina Faith Communities, 2013
ORIGINAL RESEARCH — Volume 14 — February 2, 2017
PEER REVIEWED
Figure. Counties represented by the faith communities that responded to the survey on sharing facilities for physical activity, North Carolina, 2013.
| No. of Respondents | County |
|---|---|
| 0 | Avery, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Camden, Carteret, Caswell, Clay, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Franklin, Gates, Graham, Granville, Greene, Halifax, Haywood, Hertford, Hoke, Jackson, Jones, Lenoir, Lincoln, Madison, Martin, Mitchell, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Stokes, Swain, Transylvania, Tyrrell, Union, Vance, Washington, Wilson, Yancey |
| 1–5 | Alamance, Alexander, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, Beaufort, Cabarrus, Catawba, Chatham, Cherokee, Chowan, Cleveland, Cumberland, Davie, Durham, Henderson, Hyde, Johnston, Macon, McDowell, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, New Hanover, Orange, Person, Pitt, Polk, Randolph, Richmond, Robeson, Rockingham, Rowan, Rutherford, Sampson, Scotland, Stanly, Surry, Warren, Watauga, Wayne, Wilkes, Yadkin |
| 6–9 | Davidson, Edgecombe, Gaston, Iredell, Nash |
| 10–30 | Forsyth, Guilford, Harnett, Lee, Wake |