Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review

PEER REVIEWED

During the identification process, titles and abstracts were identified through electronic sources (n = 80) and bibliographies (n = 13). After duplicates (n = 38) were removed, 55 records were screened. Records not meeting eligibility were removed (n = 39); 16 articles were eligible for full text review. Of these, 6 were excluded because they did not assess mobile mammography participation (n = 5) or were under embargo (n = 1). A final 10 articles were included in the review.

Figure.
The process of including and excluding articles analyzed in a systematic review of mobile mammography among medically underserved women, United States, January 2010–March 2018.

Return to Article

Top