Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs
ORIGINAL RESEARCH — Volume 16 — May 2, 2019
PEER REVIEWED
Figure 1.
Percentage distribution of funding sources, by year, Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2009–2014. Error bars indicate confidence intervals.
| Source | % (95% Confidence Interval) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | All Years | |
| Other | 7.2 (0.5–13.9) | 7.7 (2.1–13.3) | 7.5 (1.2–13.8) | 7.4 (1.2–13.6) | 3.5 (0–7.7) | 6.6 (4.0–9.2) |
| In kind | 8.0 (3.5–12.5) | 8.2 (4.1–12.3) | 9.3 (4.6–14.0) | 7.4 (3.1–11.7) | 5.9 (0.7–11.1) | 7.8 (5.8–9.8) |
| CDC | 84.8 (76.3–93.3) | 84.1 (76.8–91.4) | 83.2 (74.5–91.9) | 85.3 (76.6–94.0) | 90.7 (83.4–98.0) | 85.6 (82.0–89.2) |
Figure 2.
Percentage distribution of total cost by budget category, Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2009–2014.
| Category | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | All Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contracts, materials, and supplies | 45.7 | 37.6 | 40.0 | 36.3 | 39.3 | 39.4 |
| Labor | 24.0 | 25.3 | 28.3 | 27.1 | 29.4 | 26.9 |
| Screening and diagnostic services | 21.4 | 29.3 | 22.9 | 29.1 | 21.7 | 25.2 |
| Administrative | 5.1 | 5.3 | 6.4 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 5.9 |
| Consultants | 3.8 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 2.6 |